Bob O'Hara

11 posts · 5,728 views

Sort by Latest Post, Most Popular

View by Condensed, Full

  • January 17, 2012
  • 09:35 AM
  • 238 views

PCa and PCoA explained

by Bob O'Hara in Deep Thoughts and Silliness

Just before Christmas I was asked to talk to our molecular biologists about multivariate analyses. I was reminded of this on Thursday afternoon, when I saw that I had to talk to them on Friday. "Ah, no problem", I thought....... Read more »

Gower, J.C. (2005) Principal Coordinates Analysis. Encyclopedia of Biostatistics. info:/10.1002/0470011815.b2a13070

  • May 31, 2011
  • 05:44 PM
  • 652 views

Species-area relationships don't overestimate extinction rates from habitat loss

by Bob O'Hara in Deep Thoughts and Silliness

Today at work we had a journal club about a recent paper in Nature that had caused a bit of a stir. It had suggested that the reason we don't see as many extinctions due to habitat loss as we'd...... Read more »

  • May 24, 2011
  • 04:34 PM
  • 716 views

Escaping the poverty trap

by Bob O'Hara in Deep Thoughts and Silliness

(I conned GrrlScientist into posting this on her Guardian blog) Migrant Mother, Nipomo, California (1936) Image: Dorothea Lange (1895-1965) Common domain. As an old fashioned liberal, I want us all to be happy, and for the State to play a...... Read more »

  • November 30, 2010
  • 07:42 PM
  • 415 views

The Original Red Queen's Hypothesis

by Bob O'Hara in Deep Thoughts and Silliness

Leigh Van Valen (who died last month) is well known for being an original thinker. It is perhaps not surprising, then, that the only way he could publish his most famous idea was to start a journal to print it...... Read more »

Van Valen, L. (1973) A new evolutionary law. Evolutionary Theory, 1-30. info:/

  • November 17, 2010
  • 04:39 PM
  • 427 views

Rates of Scientific Fraud Retractions

by Bob O'Hara in Deep Thoughts and Silliness

Ivan Oransky on his Retraction Watch blog pointed to a paper by R. Grant Steen looking at numbers of retraction and whether they were due to fraud or error. Ivan pointed to a news item on The Great Beyond by...... Read more »

  • October 1, 2010
  • 06:29 AM
  • 601 views

Am I wasting my time?

by Bob O'Hara in Deep Thoughts and Silliness

Physicists have it easy. When they're not talking about stuffing their hands into their equipment, they're measuring their fundamental constants to 38 significant figures. Chemists too have a simple time - they get to make stinks and bangs with expensive...... Read more »

  • August 10, 2010
  • 04:43 PM
  • 481 views

The Virology of Christ

by Bob O'Hara in This Scientific Life

Now, this is just silly. Last month a case report appeared in the Virology Journal (not, I’ll admit, my normal read). It had the following title: Influenza or not influenza: Analysis of a case of high fever that happened 2000 years ago in Biblical time The original case was reported from two sources as follows [...]... Read more »

  • April 18, 2010
  • 11:14 AM
  • 544 views

*Cough cough* *choke*

by Bob O'Hara in Deep Thoughts and Silliness

All of use in central and northern Europe are suffering from the latest Icelandic insult: rather than settling their debts after their banks collapsed, they've sent us bits of less-than-prime Icelandic real estate. You can see some in this view...... Read more »

Pönkä A, Savela M, & Virtanen M. (1998) Mortality and air pollution in Helsinki. Archives of environmental health, 53(4), 281-6. PMID: 9709992  

  • April 6, 2010
  • 05:02 AM
  • 444 views

More on Branch Lengths and Species

by Bob O'Hara in Deep Thoughts and Silliness

On Monday I wrote about one of those frustrating papers that asks an interesting question, but the more you look at it, the less sure you are of the results. In this case they might be right, but I...... Read more »

  • March 22, 2010
  • 08:58 AM
  • 493 views

Branch Lengths and Species

by Bob O'Hara in Deep Thoughts and Silliness

Some creationists have become terribly excited by a recent paper and accompanying New Scientist article It'll come as no surprised that they have failed to understand the paper, and I'm confident that explaining the paper in a post won't...... Read more »

  • January 22, 2008
  • 04:12 PM
  • 717 views

Gender Differences: Need More Data!

by Bob O'Hara in Deep Thoughts and Silliness

I was asked about this last week by a colleague, and now it's hit the blogosphere, so I thought I would publicly leap into a dispute about sexism in science. And make a plea for people to actually look at their data.This was all started by a group of biologists who have been working at NCEAS on publication biases in ecology (the biggest bias is, of course, that not enough of my papers get accepted straight away). They managed to get their latest results published in TREE.The received wisdom is that there is a bias against women in science. One area where t... Read more »

A BUDDEN, T TREGENZA, L AARSSEN, J KORICHEVA, R LEIMU, & C LORTIE. (2008) Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors. Trends in Ecology , 23(1), 4-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.07.008  

join us!

Do you write about peer-reviewed research in your blog? Use ResearchBlogging.org to make it easy for your readers — and others from around the world — to find your serious posts about academic research.

If you don't have a blog, you can still use our site to learn about fascinating developments in cutting-edge research from around the world.

Register Now

Research Blogging is powered by SMG Technology.

To learn more, visit seedmediagroup.com.