SciELO , SciELO , SciELO , SciELO , SciELO , SciELO , SciELO

  • March 27, 2015
  • 04:21 PM
  • 439 views

Avaliação por pares: modalidades, prós e contras

by SciELO in SciELO em Perspectiva

O sistema duplo-cego de revisão por pares é apontado pela maioria dos pesquisadores como um mecanismo efetivo e eficiente, pois elimina julgamento subjetivo e vieses de autoria e afiliação, permitindo concentrar-se na qualidade do manuscrito. O periódico Nature reporta que os autores podem, a partir de agora escolher esta modalidade de revisão para seus manuscritos. São discutidas aqui as modalidades mais frequentes de revisão por pares, suas características, vantagens e desvantagens, i........ Read more »

  • March 20, 2015
  • 10:20 AM
  • 359 views

¿Podrían ser abiertas las evaluaciones de propuestas de financiamiento para la investigación?

by SciELO in SciELO en Perspectiva

Los investigadores han discutido sobre cuál sería el impacto de hacer que el proceso de revisión de propuestas de financiamiento de investigación fuera más abierto y transparente, con el objetivo de apoyar la redacción de mejores propuestas y reconocer el trabajo de los revisores. Un artículo reciente de Nature examina la repercusión de dos trabajos sobre la apertura del proceso de revisión de proyectos de investigación y la posibilidad de cambiar la evaluación después de la publicac........ Read more »

  • March 20, 2015
  • 10:20 AM
  • 808 views

Could grant proposal reviews be made available openly?

by SciELO in SciELO in Perspective

Researchers have been discussing what would be the impact of making the review process of grant proposals more open and transparent, in order to support the preparation of better proposals and acknowledge the work of the reviewers. A recently published paper in Nature examines the impact of two articles on the open availability of the review of research proposals and the possibility of changing the assessment after publication of the results. … Read More →... Read more »

  • March 20, 2015
  • 10:20 AM
  • 404 views

Os pareceres de propostas de financiamento a pesquisa poderiam ser abertos?

by SciELO in SciELO em Perspectiva

Pesquisadores têm discutido qual seria o impacto de tornar o processo de revisão de propostas de financiamento a pesquisa mais aberto e transparente, com o objetivo de apoiar a redação de melhores propostas e reconhecer o trabalho dos revisores. Artigo recente na Nature analisa a repercussão de dois trabalhos sobre a abertura do processo de revisão de projetos de pesquisa e a possibilidade de alteração da avaliação depois da publicação dos resultados. … Read More →... Read more »

  • March 13, 2015
  • 04:00 PM
  • 379 views

Estudio analiza el uso de las redes sociales en la evaluación del impacto científico

by SciELO in SciELO en Perspectiva

El uso de las redes sociales en la comunicación científica viene aumentado en gran escala, y han sido creadas plataformas específicas para la interacción e intercambio de información entre investigadores. En un estudio por investigadores de la Universidad St. Gallen, en Suiza, evaluaron si y cómo el impacto científico puede ser medido por medio del análisis de medios sociales, y cómo este enfoque se relaciona con las métricas tradicionales. … Read More →... Read more »

HOFFMANN, C.P., LUTZ, C., & MECKEL, M. (2014) Impact Factor 2.0: Applying Social Network Analysis to Scientific Impact Assessment. 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Science, Hilton Waikoloa Village. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2014.202  

boyd, D., & Ellison, N. (2007) Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230. DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x  

Priem, J. (2013) Scholarship: Beyond the paper. Nature, 495(7442), 437-440. DOI: 10.1038/495437a  

  • March 13, 2015
  • 04:00 PM
  • 308 views

Estudo analisa o uso de redes sociais na avaliação do impacto científico

by SciELO in SciELO em Perspectiva

O uso de redes sociais em comunicação científica vem aumentando em larga escala e plataformas específicas têm sido criadas para interação e compartilhamento de informação entre pesquisadores. Estudo de pesquisadores da Universidade St. Gallen, na Suíça, avaliaram se e como o impacto científico pode ser medido por meio da análise de dados de mídias sociais, e como esta abordagem se relaciona com as métricas tradicionais. … Read More →... Read more »

HOFFMANN, C.P., LUTZ, C., & MECKEL, M. (2014) Impact Factor 2.0: Applying Social Network Analysis to Scientific Impact Assessment. 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Science, Hilton Waikoloa Village. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2014.202  

boyd, D., & Ellison, N. (2007) Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230. DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x  

Priem, J. (2013) Scholarship: Beyond the paper. Nature, 495(7442), 437-440. DOI: 10.1038/495437a  

  • March 13, 2015
  • 04:00 PM
  • 885 views

Study analyzes the use of social networks in the assessment of scientific impact

by SciELO in SciELO in Perspective

The use of social networks in science communication has been increasing on a large scale, and specific platforms have been created for interaction and information sharing among researchers. A study by researchers at the University of St. Gallen, in Switzerland evaluated whether and how scientific impact can be measured by social media data analysis, and how this approach correlates to traditional metrics. … Read More →... Read more »

HOFFMANN, C.P., LUTZ, C., & MECKEL, M. (2014) Impact Factor 2.0: Applying Social Network Analysis to Scientific Impact Assessment. 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Science, Hilton Waikoloa Village. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2014.202  

boyd, D., & Ellison, N. (2007) Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230. DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x  

Priem, J. (2013) Scholarship: Beyond the paper. Nature, 495(7442), 437-440. DOI: 10.1038/495437a  

  • March 8, 2015
  • 10:00 AM
  • 1,133 views

Gender inequality in science varies among disciplines

by SciELO in SciELO in Perspective

Certain disciplines have a lower percentage of women than others. A study published in Science puts forward the hypothesis that there are proportionately fewer women in fields where it is believed that brilliance and innate talent are required rather than hard work and dedication. The study, which looked at 1,820 researchers in institutions of higher education in the United States, showed an inverse relationship between the fields that value innate talent and the number of women represented in t........ Read more »

  • March 5, 2015
  • 04:11 PM
  • 829 views

350 years of scientific publication: from the “Journal des Sçavans” and Philosophical Transactions to SciELO

by SciELO in SciELO in Perspective

Is has been 350 years since the first numbers of the first journals of scientific nature were published - Journal des Sçavans and Philosophical Transactions. With the support of the new printing technology handwritten letters used in the communication between researchers and scholars have been replaced. There is much to celebrate in these 350 years in which scientific journals contributed to the record and memory of the advancement of science. Online Web publishing is the most important t........ Read more »

join us!

Do you write about peer-reviewed research in your blog? Use ResearchBlogging.org to make it easy for your readers — and others from around the world — to find your serious posts about academic research.

If you don't have a blog, you can still use our site to learn about fascinating developments in cutting-edge research from around the world.

Register Now

Research Blogging is powered by SRI Technology.

To learn more, visit http://selfregulationinstitute.org/.