Nature Notes

Visit Blog Website

3 posts · 887 views

Nature Notes is a little website run by me (Laura). I have a masters degree in applied ecology and am gainfully employed as a science writer and natural science illustrator—a nice pairing of occupations that allow me to indulge a life-long fascination for nature and the wonderful organisms with whom we share this planet.

Sort by: Latest Post, Most Popular

View by: Condensed, Full

  • May 11, 2010
  • 01:19 AM
  • 134 views

The First Fossil Remains of Chimpanzees

by Laura Klappenbach in Nature Notes

Until recently, there were no known fossil remains of chimpanzees. Then in 2005, anthropologists Sally McBrearty and Nina Jablonski published a paper in the journal Nature describing three fossil chimpanzee teeth that had been unearthed from the Kapthurin Formation, a basalt outcrop west of Lake Baringo in Kenya. This discovery offered new insight into the lives ancestral chimpanzees.

Today, chimpanzees inhabit the tropical forests of West and Central Africa and are absent from the dryer habitats in East Africa. Scientists have long speculated that when chimpanzees and ancestral humans diverged between 5 and 8 million years ago, each went their separate way. Chimpanzees favored the wetter climes and tropical forests common to West and Central Africa. Human ancestors preferred the dryer savanna habitats of the East African Rift Valley, a lowland trench that stretches from Ethopia to Mozambique. But the fossil chimpanzee teeth found in the Kapthurin Formation contradict this view. Instead, these fossils indicate that ancient chimpanzees lived within the East African Rift Valley and that a clear-cut "splitting" of chimpanzee and human ranges did not occur.

Sally McBrearty and Nina Jablonski analyzed the fossil chimpanzee teeth and determined them to be about 545,000 years old, an age that places them within the Middle Pleistocene. Other fossils from that time period found nearby indicate that the ancient chimpanzees shared their habitat with crocodiles, hippopotamuses, carnivores, elephants, turtles, gastropods, tiny mammals, and Homo species such as Homo erectus and Homo rhodesiensis.

Analysis of the sediments gave clues to what the habitat of the area was like during the Middle Pleistocene. It appears that the region was probably wooded and was on the shores of a lake that alternated between freshwater and salt-alkaline water conditions.

... Read more »

McBrearty, S., & Jablonski, N. (2005) First fossil chimpanzee. Nature, 437(7055), 105-108. DOI: 10.1038/nature04008  

  • August 2, 2009
  • 10:13 AM
  • 134 views

Mysteries of the Turtle's Shell

by Laura Klappenbach in Nature Notes

The anatomy of a turtle differs so much from that of other vertebrates that scientists have long pondered how turtles evolved from their primitive reptilian ancestors. One aspect of the turtle's anatomy that never fails to capture attention is its shell. This unique structure is formed by the animal's ribs which are flattened and fused to its backbone. The skeletal oddities of the turtle do not stop with its ribs. Another skeletal arrangement unique to turtles is in evident in the placement of their shoulder blades. Instead of being located on the turtle's back (as they are in all other vertebrates), the turtle's shoulder blades lie within its ribcage. To accommodate this odd skeletal arrangement, the muscles that connect the turtle's shoulder blades to the trunk have been twisted and folded.

img/2009/img1.jpg" class="img-full" /

How did this bizarre arrangement of the turtle's shoulder blades and supporting musculature evolve? Until recently, no one really knew. The fossil record offered few insights, since no transitional forms had been unearthed that show the shoulder blade migrating over generations towards the inside of the ribcage. But now a team of scientists led by Hiroshi Nagashima from the RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology in Japan have found some clues as to how the turtle's unique bone structure could have evolved. These clues have surfaced not from examining the fossil record but from studying the embryos of turtles and other vertebrates. By comparing the embryos of Chinese soft-shelled turtles (Pelodiscus sinensi) at various stages of development to those of mice and chickens, Nagashima's team was able to visualize just how the turtle's shell develops and how the shoulder blade ends up on the underside of its shell.



During the early stages of development, the embryos of all three species have shoulder blades that sit on their back, outside of the ribcage. As the mouse and chicken embryos develop, the shoulder blades remain on the animal's back. The ribs become embedded in a layer of muscle know as the muscle plate. In contrast, as the turtle embryo develops, the second pair of ribs swings forward and grows over the shoulder blades. Meanwhile, the muscle plate tucks inward and forms the edge of the turtle's shell.

img/2009/img2.jpg" class="img-full" /

Ngashima's work not only describes a possible mechanism for the turtle's odd anatomy, but it also provides context for a recently discovered fossil turtle, Odontochelys. Onontochelys was a turtle that lacked an upper shell but posessed a lower shell (also called a plastron). It had short ribs that did not fan out as the modern turtle's do. Consequently, Onontochelys' second pair of ribs did not swing over its shoulder blades during development.

img/2009/img3.jpg" class="img-full" /... Read more »

Nagashima, H., Sugahara, F., Takechi, M., Ericsson, R., Kawashima-Ohya, Y., Narita, Y., & Kuratani, S. (2009) Evolution of the Turtle Body Plan by the Folding and Creation of New Muscle Connections. Science, 325(5937), 193-196. DOI: 10.1126/science.1173826  

  • March 10, 2009
  • 04:10 PM
  • 619 views

A Dry Year in the Amazon Rainforest

by Laura Klappenbach in Nature Notes

The Amazon rainforest is a moist broadleaf forest that blankets 5,400,000 square kilometers of the Amazon River basin in South America. The shear vastness of this forest is difficult to comprehend. It stretches across the boundaries of nine nations—Brazil, Colombia, Peru, Venezuela, Ecuador, Bolivia, Guyana, Suriname, and French Guiana. Its biodiversity is unparalleled—an estimated one in ten animals on the planet inhabits the Amazon rainforest.

The staggering proportions of the Amazon rainforest earns it high rank among the planet's most significant biological repositories of carbon. The old-growth forests of the Amazon basin store an estimated 120 Pg of carbon in their biomass—that's 1.2 x 1017g of carbon neatly locked-up in rainforest roots, trunks, branches, and leaves (Malhi 2008). The Amazon rainforest is for this reason a key stockpile of carbon, it is an immense carbon sink. But its storage of carbon is anything but stagnant.

Like all forests, the Amazon rainforest breaths. It inhales sunlight and carbon dioxide through photosynthesis. It exhales carbon dioxide through respiration and decomposition. This cycle is quietly comforting if you envision the forest as a large, slumbering organism. Comforting, that is, until you realize that this living organism, this carbon behemoth, is capable of losing its breath. If stressed, it might inhale less or exhale more. It may transform from a carbon sink into a carbon source, pumping carbon dioxide skyward at rates that exceed its uptake of the notorious greenhouse gas.

But for a moment, let's put talk of vast forests and carbon sinks aside and simply consider a single leaf. The leaf I would like to consider is pictured at the right. It is a moisture-stressed leaf and appears to be the only leaf left clinging to a young but fast-fading sapling. It was photographed in November 2005 in the Columbian Amazon during the worst drought to strike the Amazon basin in 100 years.

When this leaf inevitably dropped to the ground and the sapling died, it ceased taking up carbon dioxide from the air to photosynthesize. It decomposed and gradually returned the carbon stored in its cells back into the atmosphere in the form of carbon dioxide. When a single, tiny sapling parches and fades in this manner, the carbon dioxide it releases is minute. But when extreme drought causes widespread leaf loss and tree death, the volume of carbon dioxide that is released may be enough to swell atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations.

The drought that descended upon the Amazon River basin in 2005 was one such extraordinary event. Its more visible effects were well documented in the mainstream media (see here, here, here, and here for a few examples). There were reports of rivers that had turned to mudflats, boats that became stranded whilst waterways evaporated, and thousands of fish that perished amidst receding currents. At the time, the media attributed the lack of rainfall in the Amazon to climate change, deforestation, and abnormally warm sea surface temperatures in the North Atlantic Ocean. But from a scientific perspective, the true causes and effects of the drought would require methodical analysis to understand.

In 2008, a careful analysis of climatic data surrounding the 2005 drought event was published in Environmental Research Letters by a team of scientists lead by Ning Zeng of the University of Maryland. The figures below (from Zeng 2008) illustrate two key events that occurred in 2005, an abnormally dry Amazon River basin and an abnormally worm tropical North Atlantic Region.

Figure (a) above illustrates just how dry the Amazon basin was in 2005 as compared to mean rainfall measurements for the region over the preceding 25 years (1979-2005). Where the shaded areas are the darkest brown, rainfall deficits were the most pronounced. The regions where the drought was the most devastating were in the western and southern parts of the Amazon basin. Figure (b) above shows the abnormally warm sea surface temperatures in the North Atlantic region, with the more elevated temperatures marked by increasingly darker shades of red.

These two images—one of a dry Amazon basin and another of elevated Atlantic sea surface temperatures—provided the backdrop against which Dr. Oliver Phillips from the University of Leeds and his colleagues ventured into the depths of the Amazonian rainforest. They visited 55 study sites—plots that had been monitored for 25 years as part of the long-term research project RAINFOR. They collected data (such as tree diameter and wood density) at each location and compared it to that of past years. What they found was sites that had previously acted as carbon sinks became carbon sources under drought conditions. The diagram below (from Phillips 2009) articulates this reversal.

Figure A shows that in the years leading up to 2005, the above ground biomass (AGB) at many of the sites was on the increase (they were acting as carbon sinks). Then in 2005, shown in Figure B, there was a reversal of AGB accumulation at many sites (they had transformed to carbon sources). Figure C further isolates the situation in 2005 by showing the difference between 2005 and pre-2005 AGB accumulation. The shaded areas on the map indicate rainfall data (the darker areas reveal regions of more intense drought).

One additional part of the Amazon basin drought story is the atmospheric carbon levels. In 2005, carbon dioxide concentrations crept to the third highest level since records began. Phillips and his colleagues make mention of this in the concluding remarks of their paper (Phillips 2008) but remain cautious about what to conclude from it:

"The exceptional growth in atmospheric CO2 concentrations in 2005, the third greatest in the global record, may have been partially caused by the Amazon drought effects documented here. However, our findings do not translate simply into instantaneous flux estimates because carbon fluxes from necromass will lag the actual tree death events. Drought can suppress respiration, so the system as a whole might even contribute a temporary net sink even though the live biomass was in negative mass balance." ~ Dr. Oliver Phillips, University of Leeds (Phillips 2008)

Although the role that the Amazon rainforests play in the global carbon cycle remains cryptic, the droughts of 2005 shed light on how this vast forest ecosystem might respond to and recover in a changing climate.

Y. Malhi, J. T. Roberts, R. A. Betts, T. J. Killeen, W. Li, C. A. Nobre (2008). Climate Change, Deforestation, and the Fate of the Amazon Science, 319 (5860), 169-172 DOI: 10.1126/science.1146961

O. L. Phillips et al. (2009). Drought Sensitivity of the Amazon Rainforest Science, 323 (5919), 1344-1347 DOI: 10.1126/science.1164033

Ning Zeng, Jin-Ho Yoon, Jose A Marengo, Ajit Subramaniam, Carlos A Nobre, Annarita Mariotti, J David Neelin (2008). Causes and impacts of the 2005 Amazon drought Environmental Research Letters, 3 (1) DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/3/1/014002

Photo (top) © Peter van der Steen. The Amazon forest canopy from above, blanketed in a dawn mist. Photo (bottom) © Peter Vitzthum. Moisture-stressed leaf. Diagram (top) from Malhi 2008. Diagram (bottom) from Phillips 2009.... Read more »

O. L. Phillips et al. (2009) Drought Sensitivity of the Amazon Rainforest. Science, 323(5919), 1344-1347. DOI: 10.1126/science.1164033  

join us!

Do you write about peer-reviewed research in your blog? Use ResearchBlogging.org to make it easy for your readers — and others from around the world — to find your serious posts about academic research.

If you don't have a blog, you can still use our site to learn about fascinating developments in cutting-edge research from around the world.

Register Now

Research Blogging is powered by SMG Technology.

To learn more, visit seedmediagroup.com.