6 posts · 5,144 views
On this web log I explore topics related to genetics, food and farming
Pamela Ronald
6 posts
Sort by: Latest Post, Most Popular
View by: Condensed, Full
by Pamela Ronald in Tomorrow's Table
Check out this great post by Mary M on biofortifed. In it she reviews a new research paper that describes how the use of Bt could potentially save the lives of millions.
You can download a video about the researchers and their work here.
From Mary's post: "For some people, a great deal of the conflama around genetically-engineered (GE) crops has to do with the presence of a pesticide in the plant material--mainly the Bacillus thuringiensis or Bt protein--rather than coating the surface of the plant as organic Bt sprays or chemical-style pesticides would. No matter how many times I explain that there are benefits to this strategy (such as reduced impact on non-target species and on improvements in farm family health among others), it doesn't seem to help. No matter how many times I explain that pesticides aren't the only modification to plants (as we see at Biofortified regularly), it doesn't matter to critics of GE. The fact that plants make their own pesticides? Not interested. And no matter how many times I explain how the Bt proteins work only on species that have the specific receptor for that interaction--and therefore does not affect humans as it would the corn borer pest--it doesn't seem to have any impact. The misplaced fear continues to be used by the critics.ResearchBlogging.org
So when I saw this paper that suggested the Bt protein may be a powerful strategy for improving the lives of impoverished children around the world, all I could do was wonder if that might finally register with those who make unsupported claims of the effects of Bt on humans."
Read the rest of this post... | Read the comments on this post...... Read more »
Hu, Y., Georghiou, S., Kelleher, A., & Aroian, R. (2010) Bacillus thuringiensis Cry5B Protein Is Highly Efficacious as a Single-Dose Therapy against an Intestinal Roundworm Infection in Mice. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 4(3). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000614
by Pamela Ronald in Tomorrow's Table
When I give lectures about the global food supply and the environment, someone in the audience will often comment that the best way to solve the problem is to quit producing so much food.
I find this type of "Let 'em starve" approach quite horrific from a humanitarian view. It also makes no sense scientifically.
Read the rest of this post... | Read the comments on this post...... Read more »
Myrskylä, M., Kohler, H., & Billari, F. (2009) Advances in development reverse fertility declines. Nature, 460(7256), 741-743. DOI: 10.1038/nature08230
by Pamela Ronald in Tomorrow's Table
In plant and animal innate immunity, like many of the dances of life, it takes two to tango. A receptor molecule in the plant pairs up with a specific molecule on the invading bacteria and, presto, the immune system swings into action to defend against the invasion of the disease-causing microbe.
Unwrapping some of the mystery from how plants and bacteria communicate in this dance of immunity, hardworking scientists in my laboratory here at the University of California, Davis, have identified the bacterial molecule that matches up with a specific receptor in rice plants to ward off a devastating disease known as bacterial blight of rice.
The publication describing these results will appear tomorrow in the journal Science.
Read the rest of this post... | Read the comments on this post...... Read more »
Sang-Won Lee, Sang-Wook Han, Malinee Sririyanum, Chang-Jin Park, Young-Su Seo, & Pamela C. Ronald. (2009) A Type I–Secreted, Sulfated Peptide Triggers XA21-Mediated Innate Immunity . Science Magazine, 850-853. info:/DOI: 10.1126/science.1173438
by Pamela Ronald in Tomorrow's Table
Check out the latest review of "Tomorrow’s Table" published in PLoS Biology.Here is a response to one of the points raised in the review as to what is “natural” or appropriate for agriculture.Because plants are rich in sugars, proteins, vitamins and minerals, they make obvious and tempting treats for various predators. Plants cannot run away, so instead they have evolved a set of defenses to protect themselves. Celery is seemingly benign, yet it produces toxic compounds called psoralens to discourage predators and avoid being a snack too early in its life cycle. Sometimes humans are the accidental victims of psoralen poisoning.Breeders have selected celery with relatively high amounts of psoralens because farmers prefer to grow insect resistant plants and consumers prefer to buy undamaged produce. Unfortunately, workers who harvest such celery sometimes develop a severe skin rash (NAS 2004), an unintended consequence of this conventional breeding. Raoul, who is an organic farmer discovered that green potatoes make pretty good rodent poison. One day he went into the certified organic hoophouse to find three dead mice near some freshly eaten green potatoes. Potatoes produce glycoalkaloid solanine, a toxic compound, although most varieties have amounts so small that they are considered nonhazardous to animals. Some potato varieties, however, have higher levels than others and certain conditions such as light can cause hazardous levels of the toxin to be produced.So far, compounds that are toxic to animals have only cropped up in foods developed through conventional breeding approaches. There have not been any adverse health or environmental effects resulting from commercialized GE crops. This may be because foods produced by GE undergo additional scrutiny, or it may be that there simply are not yet many GE crops on the market. Whatever the reason, this important fact is sometimes lost in the debates on GE food.Many people view genetic engineering of crops as “unnatural” and see it as an inappropriate tool to use in crop breeding. What sort of criteria, then, can we use to assess its benefits? An appropriate technology, as asserted by the economist Schumacher in his book Small is Beautiful, should promote values such as health, beauty, and permanence (Schumacher 1973). Low cost and low maintenance requirements are also of prime importance in Schumacher’s definition. Considering both Schumacher’s observations and our goals for ecological farming, it is apparent that GE will sometimes be appropriate for food modification and sometimes not. This is because GE is simply a tool that can be applied to a multitude of uses, depending on the decisions of policy makers, farmers, and consumers.Still, as we attempt to show in our book, GE comprises many of the properties advocated by Schumacher. It is a relatively simple technology that scientists in most countries, including many developing countries, have perfected. The product of GE technology, a seed, requires no extra maintenance or additional farming skills. Its arrangement of genes can be passed down from generation to generation and improved along the way. It is therefore clear that humans will likely reap many significant and life-saving benefits from GE. This is because even incremental increases in the nutritional content, disease resistance, yield, or stress tolerance of crops can go a long way to enhancing the health and well-being of farmers and their families. There is also potential for applications of GE to reduce the adverse environmental effects of farming and enable farmers to produce and sell more food locally. Indeed, the use of GE has already drastically reduced the amount of pesticides sprayed worldwide, saved the U.S. papaya industry, and provided new tools to save the lives of impoverished children.Trewavas, T. (2008). Redefining “Natural†in Agriculture. PLoS Biology, 6(8), e199. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060199... Read more »
Tony Trewavas. (2008) Redefining “Natural” in Agriculture. PLoS Biology, 6(8). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060199
by Pamela Ronald in Tomorrow's Table
California is burning.The smoke obscures my view of Lake Tahoe from our cabin on the eastern side of the Sierra Nevada Mountains. I can also no longer see the distinctive snow cross on the flank of the 10,000-foot peak of Mt Tallac. The children cough and I rub my eyes. The smokiness invades our cabin, our clothes, our hair. Ash drops out of the sky. It is hot.Again? Just last summer, the Angora fire burned within 4 miles of our cabin. This June, a massive lightning storm sparked 800 wildfires across the state- one of the largest is burning in the foothills about 100 miles from here.Perhaps I shouldn’t be so surprised. After all, heat and fire are predicted consequences of global climate change. Officials say that the unprecedented fire season, fuelled by drought and 100 degrees Fahrenheit temperatures, represents the most fires burning at any one time in recorded California history. I see it, I smell it. I breathe it. I get it.Discouraged, I walk barefoot outside to check on one of my favorite wildflowers- the Explorers gentian (Gentiana calycosa). It grows in a small meadow at the base of a massive incense cedar (Calocedrus decurrens). I see that the buds are just forming on the low leafy plants. Later this summer, the Gentian will regale us with exquisite showy masses of bright blue, yellow-spotted flowers.I continue to the back of the house to a wooded thicket, where one-sided wintergreen (Pyrola picta), an evergreen perennial grows. Small and unobtrusive, with its flower buds perched awkwardly on one side of its single flowering stock, this tiny wintergreen seems as if it is to shy to join the party. But up close, I can see that this is no wallflower. Its buds are bell-shaped with beautiful pale green flowers. Down the hill, under the pines, I see a patch of bright red. This is the solitary snow plant (Sarcodes sanguinea). Always the first flash of color after the snow melt, this stout fleshy plant is the joy of the children. It lacks chlorophyll so cannot make its own food through photosynthesis. Apparently it supplements its nutrient intake by at least partially parasitizing the roots of pine trees by means of a shared mycorrhizal fungus.My favorite plants, those my family have seen each summer for over 50 years, appear to be fine. I am reassured. But what will the climate change do to these species? Now we have an answer and it is not good.In a recent article in PLoS One, Loarie et al., assess the potential impacts of climate change on the native flora of California. They examine 8 different potential scenarios for the future of the California flora in the face of climate change. They project that up to 66% of California native species will experience 80% reductions in range size within a century.They find that the foothills of the northern Sierra Nevada are extremely vulnerable to species loss and that species in some mountainous areas will shrink in range. These areas include the Gentian, the snow plant and the wintergreen.Photos courtesy of Matt Below.Loarie, S.R., Carter, B.E., Hayhoe, K., McMahon, S., Moe, R., Knight, C.A., Ackerly, D.D., McClain, C.R. (2008). Climate Change and the Future of California's Endemic Flora. PLoS ONE, 3(6), e2502. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002502... Read more »
Scott Loarie, Benjamin E Carter, Katharine Hayhoe, Sean McMahon, Richard Moe, Charles A Knight, David D Ackerly, & Craig R McClain. (2008) Climate Change and the Future of California's Endemic Flora. PLoS ONE, 3(6). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002502
by Pamela Ronald in Tomorrow's Table
Each year an estimated 15 million hectares of rice lands (a region half the size of Italy) in South and Southeast Asia are inundated by flash floods. In Bangladesh, during the monsoon, roads are so wet that they become waterways for homemade sailboats rigged with cloth, jute, and bamboo. Such lands are home to an estimated 140 million people of whom 70 million are living on less than $1 a day, the highest concentration of poor people in the world. Here, losses of rice production can be over $1 billion per year. This number, however does not capture the human suffering caused by the catastrophic crop losses where people get about two-thirds of their total calories from rice. Although rice is the only cereal that can withstand some flooding, most rice varieties will die if submerged for too long. There are a few rare exception and these are of great interest to rice breeders. One of these is the traditional Indian rice variety, FR13A. This rice plant has an unusual and agronomically important trait- the seedlings are able to withstand fourteen days of submergence. It is, however, low yielding and no longer widely grown. FR13A originated in the state of Orissa, in eastern India, bordered on the east by the Bay of Bengal. Hindu temples dating to the thirteenth century are scattered through the area. Today most of the people there still speak the ancient dialect of Oriya, and the majority are still rice farmers. For over fifty years, breeders tried to use FR13A as a parent plant to introduce the submergence tolerance trait into high yielding, tastier varieties favored by rice farmers in other parts of Asia. Frustratingly, the resulting new varieties were of poor quality. The main reason for thisbreeding failure was that, because they were not really sure which genes were needed or where in the genome they were located, the breeders accidentally introduced other genes that reduced the overall quality of the rice. In 1996, Dave Mackill, a scientist at the International Rice Research Institute who had been studying this problem for 10 years, asked if I would use my expertise in rice genetics to help him identify the submergence tolerance gene from FR13A. Within a couple of years after joining my lab, the husband and wife team of Kenong and Xia Xu were able to locate the submergence tolerance trait to a very small region of one of the rice chromosomes. Computer programs allowed us to predict the function of the genes in this region, one of them, an ethylene responsive transcription factors, was of particular interest. Based on what we knew about this gene, we hypothesized that it might act as a master switch to regulate complex functions of the plant. It was as if Kenong and Xia had been able to unravel a ball, woven from 42,000 silken threads all of a slightly different hue, and to pull out one thread, interlaced but distinct from the others. Unlike weavers, geneticists cannot determine if the thread they hold is the one they want simply by looking at it; instead they need to test it by weaving it into another pattern—in this case another rice plant that normally cannot survive floods. So that is what we did. We genetically engineered (GE) this single thread, carrying the submergence tolerance trait, into a rice variety that normally would die in a flood. We wanted to know if incorporation of this one gene would allow the plant to survive. To test this hypothesis, we transplanted the young GE seedlings and then submerged them for over two weeks. After 10 days, we could see that only a few of the control rice plants lacking the gene survived the flood and these were weak, spindly and very pale. The flaccid appearance is typical of plants that have drowned, lacking the air and sun- light needed to function. It was unlikely that this group of plants would survive much longer. We then looked at the row of GE plants that carried the genetic information from the submergence tolerant Indian variety. If we had identified and introduced the correct gene, the plants would have survived the extended time underwater and recovered. I hurried over and gently touched the bright green leaves of the first plant. My eyes quickly traveled down the row. They were alive. It was as though the rice plants had been able to hold their breath until the water was gone. Our work represents the latest genetic change in the rice plant, which was first cultivated along the Yangtze River 6000 years ago. Since that time, hundreds of thousands of rice varieties have been developed. It is likely that FR13A was selected by Orissan farmers because it could survive the floods particular to that area. It was then handed down from one generation to the next, prized then, as now, for its submergence tolerance. We now know that the submergence tolerance trait is found not only in the Orissan variety, but also in two traditional varieties from Sri Lanka. It appears that ancestors of the Sinhalese, who originated from Orissa and migrated to the island twenty-five hundred years ago, transported these precious rice grains over thousands of kilometers. Perhaps as geneticists, we are acting as humans have always done: learning the secrets of the sacred and ancient and passing that knowledge to others, who will then use that information in a new and unexpected way. The submergence tolerance gene has now returned to southern Asia in another new form. With the use of marker-assisted breeding (a kind of hybrid between conventional breeding and genetic engineering) Dave and coworkers have introduced this gene into rice varieties that are adapted to habitats in South and Southeast Asia. These genetically modified plants can withstand fourteen days of submergence, and they yield and taste the same as their parent variety that is popular with local growers. Last fall Dave assessed the productivity of these varieties on farm trials in Bangladesh. The weather in Asia last year was ferocious. Monsoon rains inundated countries from the Philippines to Nepal. Super typhoons slammed into China and Japan. All of this was bad for rice. And what's bad for rice is especially bad for Bangladesh.Jon Hamilton, a National Public Radio correspondent, recently interviewed farmers who had planted sub1 rice. This is his report: “Gobindra Chandra Rai is a farmer whose field had been under water just a few weeks earlier. He says that when the floods came, the whole area was submerged up to about waist high.The government gave farmers in Gobindra's village seedlings with the flood-resistance gene, but most hadn't planted them in time. When the monsoon floods came early, Gobindra was the only one that had. So he and his neighbors watched Gobindra's field anxiously.The field was under water for eight days. Gobindra says that usually after eight days, the crop would be damaged. But the sub-1 rice is still thriving. He tends to it carefully. If a stalk is leaning, he straightens it. If a leaf is muddy, he squeezes it clean between two wet fingers.Gobindra says his neighbors are amazed by what they've seen in his paddy. Standing in a semi-circle in front of a shed made of bamboo and corrugated sheet metal, they line up to talk about Gobindra's rice. Men stand up front. Women farther back. And little boys climb on anything tall enough to give them a better look.Many of the farmers can't read or write. But when it comes to rice science, they're at the cutting edge. And every single one in Gobindra's village now plans on planting the sub-1 variety.”Xu, K., Xu, X., Fukao, T., Canlas, P., Maghirang-Rodriguez, R., Heuer, S., Ismail, A.M., Bailey-Serres, J., Ronald, P.C., Mackill, D.J. (2006). Sub1A is an ethylene-response-factor-like gene that confers submergence tolerance to rice. Nature, 442(7103), 705-708. DOI: 10.1038/nature04920... Read more »
Kenong Xu, Xia Xu, Takeshi Fukao, Patrick Canlas, Reycel Maghirang-Rodriguez, Sigrid Heuer, Abdelbagi Ismail, Julia Bailey-Serres, Pamela Ronald, & David Mackill. (2006) Sub1A is an ethylene-response-factor-like gene that confers submergence tolerance to rice. Nature, 442(7103), 705-708. DOI: 10.1038/nature04920
Do you write about peer-reviewed research in your blog? Use ResearchBlogging.org to make it easy for your readers — and others from around the world — to find your serious posts about academic research.
If you don't have a blog, you can still use our site to learn about fascinating developments in cutting-edge research from around the world.